Hi Gurus:
The rounding rule of good receipt for local currency in PO1 is always round up while the reaction in PO2 is commercial. Why the rounding rule between PO1 and PO2 is different ?
Processing steps of PO1 were:
- 1. I created PO1 with 5.7 USD net price, price unit=1000 EA, quantity=10000 EA.
- 2. Some properties belong to PO1 are: item category=S, account assignment category=X, condition type=PB00, without tax or other conditions, document currency =USD, local currency =TWD, exchange rate: 1USD= 31.4905 TWD.
- 3. 1st partial GR(quantity=3000): USD amount=17.10(5.7 x 3000/1000),TWD amount= 539(17.10 x 31.4905=538.48755, but SAP ERP rounded it to 539, using the rule of round up).
- 4. I did Invoice receipt against 1st partial GR of PO1, the TWD amount of vendor line item=538(17.10 x 31.4905=538.48755, then SAP ERP rounded it to 538, using the rule of commercial).
- 5. Due to the difference between GR and IR, SAP created 1 TWD dollar in credit account. All of the line items are:
TWD line items for PO1 GR1 :
Debit: Expenditure 539 TWD
Credit: GR/IR clearing 539 TWD
TWD line items against the GR1 above :
Debit: GR/IR clearing 539 TWD
Credit: vendor 538 TWD
Expenditure 1 TWD
- 6. Next did 2nd partial GR(quantity=7000): USD amount=39.90(5.7 x 7000/1000),TWD amount= 1257(39.90 x 31.4905=1256.47095, but SAP ERP rounded it to 1257, using the rule of round up).
- 7. Then I did Invoice receipt against 2nd partial GR of PO1, the TWD amount of vendor line item=1256(39.90 x 31.4905=1256.47095, then SAP ERP rounded it to 1256, using the rule of commercial).
- 8. Due to the difference between GR and IR, SAP created 1 TWD dollar in credit account. All of the line items are:
TWD line items for PO1 GR2 :
Debit: Expenditure TWD 1257
Credit: GR/IR clearing TWD 1257
TWD line items against the GR2 above :
Debit: GR/IR clearing TWD 1257
Credit: vendor TWD 1256
Expenditure TWD 1
Processing steps of PO2 were:
- 1. I created PO2 with 8.9 USD net price, price unit=1000 EA, quantity=20000 EA.
- 2. Some properties belong to PO2 are the same as PO1 mentioned above.
- 3. 1st partial GR(quantity=1247): USD amount=11.10(8.9 x 1247/1000=11.0983, SAP ERP rounded it to 11.10, using the rule of commercial),TWD amount= 349(11.0983 x 31.4905=349.4910, but SAP ERP rounded it to 349, using the rule of commercial).
- 4. I did Invoice receipt against 1st partial GR of PO2, the TWD amount of vendor line item=350(11.10 x 31.4905=349.54, then SAP ERP rounded it to 350, using the rule of commercial)
- 5. Due to the difference between GR and IR, SAP created 1 TWD dollar in credit account. All of the line items are:
TWD line items for PO2 GR1 :
Debit: Expenditure 349 TWD
Credit: GR/IR clearing 349 TWD
TWD line items against the GR1 above :
Debit: GR/IR clearing 349 TWD
Expenditure 1 TWD
Credit: vendor 350 TWD
- 6. Next did 2nd partial GR(quantity= 18753): USD amount=166.90(8.9 x 18753/1000=166.9017, SAP ERP rounded it to 166.90, using the rule of commercial),TWD amount= 5256(166.90 x 31.4905=5255.76, but SAP ERP rounded it to 5256, using the rule of commercial).
- 7. Then I did Invoice receipt against 2nd partial GR of PO2, the TWD amount of vendor line item=5256(166.90 x 31.4905=5255.76, but SAP ERP rounded it to 5256, using the rule of commercial)
- 8. There is no difference between GR and IR. All of the line items are:
TWD line items for PO2 GR2 :
Debit: Expenditure 5256 TWD
Credit: GR/IR clearing 5256 TWD
TWD line items against the GR2 above :
Debit: GR/IR clearing 5256 TWD
Credit: vendor 5256 TWD
So we can find that the rounding rule of good receipt for local currency in PO1 is always round up while the reaction in PO2 is commercial. The rounding rule to invoice receipt in both POs are the same(the rule of commercial).
Why the rounding rule between PO1 and PO2 is different ?
I am appreciated if you can propose solutions for this.
Weaver.